This academic analysis examines how the European Union is increasingly utilizing Article 114 TFEU internal market powers to regulate media independence, political advertising, and corporate sustainability. The authors argue that while this approach facilitates legislative action in contentious areas, it risks framing fundamental values through a narrow economic lens and mandates maximum harmonization that may limit national-level protections.
By framing media independence and advertising transparency as essential for a functioning single market, the EU can pass significant regulations via qualified majority voting rather than unanimous consent. This shift effectively creates a unified regulatory floor for streaming and audiovisual services, reducing the fragmentation caused by varying national laws in France, Germany, and the Netherlands. However, the reliance on maximum harmonization means that individual nations can no longer implement stricter protections once an EU standard is set. This creates a new compliance baseline for digital platforms and media houses operating across the continent. Watch for the European Court of Justice ruling on Case C-486/24 to see if Hungary's legal challenge to this regulatory basis gains traction.
The European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), which entered into force in August 2024, has begun generating concrete enforcement mechanisms across member states. In March 2025, the European Board for Media Services published its first set of guidelines on media ownership transparency requirements under the EMFA, establishing a standardized reporting template that national regulators must adopt by August 2025. The Board, composed of representatives from each member state's media authority, also issued a recommendation on audience measurement methodologies, directly affecting how streaming platforms report viewership data for advertising purposes. Meanwhile, the European Commission opened infringement proceedings against Poland in February 2025 for failing to transpose the EMFA's independence safeguards for public service media, signaling that Brussels intends to enforce compliance rather than rely on voluntary adoption.
The Regulation on Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA), which applies from October 2025, introduces specific obligations for digital platforms that host political ads, including real-time disclosure of sponsorship, targeting parameters, and expenditure data. The European Data Protection Board issued an opinion in January 2025 clarifying that the TTPA's data-processing provisions take precedence over national electoral laws where they conflict, a ruling that directly impacts streaming services running programmatic political ad campaigns in multiple EU markets. The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), adopted in May 2024, adds a separate compliance layer: the German government announced in April 2025 that it would delay its national implementation of the CSDDD until 2027, citing administrative burden on mid-sized companies, creating an uneven enforcement timeline that complicates cross-border media operations already subject to EMFA and TTPA obligations.
On the technical side, the EMFA's Article 18 requires member states to ensure that media service providers disclose their audience measurement systems, a provision with direct implications for streaming platforms using proprietary metrics. , creating a compliance gap that the EMFA's maximum harmonization approach is designed to close. The study also noted that the absence of common standards has allowed dominant platforms to define measurement on their own terms, a dynamic the EMFA's transparency requirements aim to correct by mandating third-party auditability. Future rules may further tighten these subscription and transparency standards.
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source