Codec comparison tools still leave engineers stitching data together
The article discusses the common tool stack used by video engineers for codec comparison, highlighting the limitations of current tools for analyzing codecs like H.264, HEVC, VP9, and AV1. It specifically mentions MediaInfo, Bitrate Viewer, and Moscow State University VQMT, noting their critical gaps in providing comprehensive data for RD curves and BD-Rate.
Key Takeaways
- MediaInfo is used for file data in the typical codec comparison stack.
- Bitrate Viewer is used to view bitrate for H.264-encoded files on Windows.
- Moscow State University VQMT is used on Windows for metrics.
- RD curves and BD-Rate data are often built with custom data-input scripts and Excel.
- The article says most tools have critical gaps, limiting comprehensive codec analysis across H.264, HEVC, VP9, and AV1.
Why It Matters
The immediate takeaway is operational: codec comparison in streaming still depends on multiple tools and manual assembly, not one unified workflow. That affects anyone trying to compare H.264, HEVC, VP9, and AV1 on RD curves or BD-Rate, because the article says current tools leave critical gaps. The ecosystem angle is straightforward: MediaInfo, Bitrate Viewer, and Moscow State University VQMT each cover part of the problem, but none are described as comprehensive. What to watch next is whether engineers keep extending the stack with scripts and Excel, or whether a tool emerges that handles file data, metrics, and BD-Rate in one place.
Read full article at streaminglearningcenter.com
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source