TCL challenges InterDigital's AV1 patent as litigation targets hardware manufacturers
TCL has filed an Inter Partes Review against an InterDigital patent concerning AV1 video compression, escalating ongoing global litigation over codec licensing. The dispute is part of a broader series of legal actions between the companies currently playing out across the U.S., Europe, and India.
Key Takeaways
- TCL filed IPR2026-00417 on July 9, 2026, challenging claims 1, 4, 7, and 8 of US10,250,877.
- TCL's invalidity grounds closely mirror those used by Amazon, which secured an IPR institution against the same patent in June 2026.
- InterDigital's parallel litigation spans the U.S., Germany, Brazil, and India, targeting HEVC, VP9, AV1, and HDR technologies.
- Unified Patents reports TCL as the sixth most-sued defendant in U.S. district courts with 14 cases in H1 2026.
- A 2023 licensing agreement between TCL and InterDigital likely expired, leading to the current multi-jurisdictional enforcement actions.
Why It Matters
Hardware manufacturers are increasingly using the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to neutralize compression patents that underpin modern 4K and streaming services. By mirroring Amazon’s successful strategy, TCL aims to invalidate a fundamental AV1 patent, which could lower royalty pressures for other TV makers like Hisense and Lenovo. For the broader ecosystem, this signals a shift where standard-essential patent (SEP) disputes are no longer just about mobile phones, but now center on the software-defined video stack. The outcome will decide the financial viability of integrating "royalty-free" codecs like AV1 in consumer hardware. Watch for whether the PTAB joins these petitions to consolidate the challenge against InterDigital’s portfolio.
Additional Context
The litigation involving TCL reflects a broader trend of intensified IP pressure on Chinese technology firms. Per Managing IP in June 2026, Chinese companies faced 1,227 new intellectual property lawsuits in the U.S. during the previous year, with nearly half identified as patent infringement disputes. This environment has forced manufacturers to move beyond simple defense; companies increasingly use Inter Partes Review (IPR) and ex parte reexaminations to challenge the validity of asserted patents before they reach trial. Relatedly, InterDigital has successfully leveraged its video patent portfolio to secure major agreements with other streaming and hardware giants. Per Reuters and Dow Jones in June 2026, InterDigital reached a comprehensive licensing deal with Amazon that covers Prime Video and various devices. That agreement resolved pending litigation and moved remaining rate disputes to binding arbitration. The Amazon settlement was viewed by market observers as a validation of InterDigital's video licensing model, yet the ongoing resistance from hardware manufacturers like TCL and Hisense suggests the industry remains divided on royalty rates for non-FRAND codecs like AV1. Furthermore, the legal landscape is shifting toward specialized venues. Per Unified Patents in July 2026, the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas continue to handle nearly 37% of patent litigation. However, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in Europe has emerged as a critical second front for these disputes. InterDigital’s use of the UPC’s Munich Local Division against TCL highlights a strategy of seeking pan-European injunctions, which can exert significantly more leverage during license renewals than localized U.S. district court actions alone.
Read full article at michael7924.substack.com
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source