Dish Sues DAZN Over Adaptive Bitrate Streaming Patents
Dish and Sling have filed a patent infringement lawsuit against sports streaming platform DAZN in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint alleges that DAZN infringes on five adaptive bitrate streaming patents acquired by Dish's parent company, EchoStar, from Move Networks. These patents have previously been successfully defended by Dish against other companies.
Key Takeaways
- Dish and Sling filed a patent infringement lawsuit against DAZN in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
- The lawsuit centers on five adaptive bitrate streaming patents EchoStar acquired from Move Networks for $45 million in 2010.
- Dish previously secured infringement victories with these patents against Peloton, iFit, and Lululemon’s Mirror at the U.S. International Trade Commission.
Why It Matters
This lawsuit highlights the ongoing intellectual property battles in the streaming industry, particularly concerning core technologies like adaptive bitrate streaming. Dish, through EchoStar, has historically defended these patents, indicating a persistent strategy to monetize its IP portfolio. The outcome could set a precedent for how widely adopted streaming technologies are licensed, potentially affecting numerous platforms. Watch for any out-of-court settlements or court rulings that clarify the scope and enforceability of these adaptive bitrate patents.
Additional Context
Dish’s legal action against DAZN continues a pattern of aggressive patent enforcement related to adaptive bitrate streaming. The company has filed numerous lawsuits against streamers, including Fubo and Vidgo, alleging infringement of its adaptive bitrate patents (The Desk, October 2023). However, this strategy faces challenges. In an October 2025 development, The Desk reported that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) appeal board voided elements of one key adaptive bitrate patent (Patent Number 10496554-B2) central to Dish's lawsuits. The USPTO found that 14 specific claims within the patent were preempted by prior inventions from Robert Ogden (2000) and Geoff Allen (2002). Dish has appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit, arguing the USPTO misapplied the law of obviousness and improperly combined prior art descriptions. This ongoing appeal could significantly impact Dish's ability to enforce its adaptive bitrate patents. If the USPTO's decision is upheld, it could undermine Dish's litigation strategy and lead to the dismissal of pending cases. Separately, Fubo challenged the validity of Dish’s adaptive bitrate patents through an “inter partes review” with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (The Desk, May 2025). This review process examines whether a patent holder has a valid right to their patent. The outcome of Fubo’s challenge and Dish's appeal will be critical in determining the future of these streaming technology patents.
Read full article at cablefax.com
Get this in your inbox → Subscribe
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source