UPC appoints 12-member expert group to draft FRAND resolution guidelines
The Unified Patent Court's Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC) has appointed a 12-member working group to establish best practices and non-binding guidelines for resolving FRAND licensing disputes. The initiative aims to streamline the resolution of standard-essential patent conflicts for all stakeholders through mediation and arbitration.
Key Takeaways
- The 12-member group includes prominent figures such as Sir Robin Jacob, Dr. Matthias Zigann, and industry veteran Taraneh Maghame.
- Guidelines being developed are non-binding best practices designed to assist arbitrators and neutrals in managing FRAND disputes efficiently.
- The PMAC officially launched mediation and arbitration services in June 2026, receiving its first joint mediation request within two weeks of inauguration.
- Public stakeholders, including SEP holders and implementers, will have two opportunities to submit comments before the guidelines are finalized.
Why It Matters
The establishment of formal FRAND guidelines signals the UPC's intent to become the primary hub for resolving high-stakes licensing conflicts that have historically bogged down the tech sector. By integrating alternative dispute resolution (ADR) directly into the judicial ecosystem, the PMAC offers an enforceable alternative to the fragmented national court system. For streaming video, this provides a structured forum to resolve escalating disputes over video codec and Wi-Fi standards without the volatility of protracted litigation. Watch for the release of the group's initial discussion paper this fall as a signal for how aggressively the PMAC will intervene in royalty rate determinations.
Additional Context
The formation of the FRAND Working Group follows the official inauguration of the PMAC on June 2, 2026, in Ljubljana, Slovenia. This launch arrives at a critical juncture for European intellectual property policy; per Meissner Bolte and Sternekessler, the European Commission formally withdrew its controversial proposal for Standard Essential Patent (SEP) Regulation in 2025 due to a lack of consensus among member states. The now-withdrawn regulation would have mandated a central SEP registry and pre-litigation conciliation. With that legislative path stalled, industry eyes have shifted to the UPC's judicial and ADR frameworks to fill the regulatory vacuum. Streaming video technologies have emerged as a primary driver of this renewed focus on SEP policy. According to Cornerstone Research from March 2026, digital video compression standards like HEVC and VVC now represent the 'new frontier' of patent litigation, mirroring the intensity of earlier smartphone patent wars. This trend is corroborated by Fish & Richardson reporting in February 2026, which found that litigation involving video codec SEPs increased 103% between 2020 and 2025. Unlike cellular standards, which are largely centralized at ETSI, video codec declarations are governed by a more fragmented ISO/IEC/ITU policy, making the PMAC’s push for consistent FRAND guidelines particularly relevant for streaming platforms. Simultaneously, the UPC Court of Appeal is testing the limits of its own authority regarding licensing. In March 2026, the court upheld a decision in Sun Patent Trust v. Vivo to keep alive a request for the court to directly determine global FRAND terms, per HSF Kramer and ip fray. This marks a potential shift toward the UK's approach of court-determined rates, a possibility that increases the strategic importance of the PMAC’s voluntary ADR services as a more confidential, expert-led alternative for companies seeking to avoid a public judicial rate-setting precedent.
Read full article at ipfray.com
Get this in your inbox → Subscribe
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source