UK Supreme Court rules English courts can set global patent pool rates
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that English courts hold jurisdiction to determine global FRAND royalty rates for standard-essential patent (SEP) pools. The decision in Tesla v InterDigital & Avanci allows implementers to challenge global licensing rates proactively in UK courts, impacting companies across the telecommunications, automotive, and audiovisual sectors.
Key Takeaways
- Tesla can now proceed with High Court claims challenging the $32-per-vehicle licensing rate set by the Avanci 5G platform.
- The ruling establishes that licensing through a third-party platform does not exempt patent owners like InterDigital from individual FRAND obligations.
- English courts confirmed jurisdiction even when UK patents represent a small fraction (7%) of the global portfolio being licensed.
- Implementers may now proactively seek UK declarations on global rates to avoid potential market exclusion via injunctions without waiting for infringement suits.
Why It Matters
This decision solidifies the UK as the primary global venue for SEP rate-setting, shifting leverage from patent pools to implementers. By allowing proactive challenges to platform-wide fees, the court forces collective licensing entities to justify pricing models that were previously shielded from direct judicial scrutiny. For the streaming ecosystem, this creates a precedent for challenging video codec pools where fragmented licensing often stalls device deployment. Strategists should monitor the High Court's upcoming substantive determination, as a rate reduction could trigger a wave of forum shopping by hardware manufacturers seeking to lower global IP overhead.
Additional Context
The Tesla decision extends a legal framework established in the 2020 Unwired Planet v Huawei ruling, which first granted English courts the power to set global licensing terms. While that case focused on bilateral negotiations between a single patent owner and an implementer, the new ruling addresses the rise of collective licensing platforms. Per Stinson, the Avanci 5G platform launched in August 2023 with a flat rate of $32 per vehicle, representing a 60% increase over its 4G pricing of $20. This pricing shift has faced significant pushback from automotive trade groups like the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which characterized the rates as market-driven rather than FRAND-principled in July 2024.
The UK’s growing role as a global FRAND arbiter comes as other regulatory efforts stall. Per Garrigues and JUVE Patent, the European Commission officially withdrew its proposed Regulation on Standard Essential Patents in October 2025 due to a lack of consensus among member states. That proposal had sought to move FRAND determinations to a mandatory conciliation procedure at the EUIPO. The withdrawal, following intense lobbying by SEP holders like Nokia and Ericsson, leaves a regulatory vacuum that the UK judiciary is now actively filling through case law.
Beyond automotive, the implications for the streaming sector are immediate as litigation shifts toward newer technical standards. Per Fish & Richardson, SEP litigation involving video codecs and Wi-Fi increased by 15% between 2020 and 2025. In June 2026, the Global Standards Leadership Conference highlighted that streaming media is transitioning from traditional device-based licensing to usage-based models. The UK Supreme Court's willingness to scrutinize entire pools suggests that upcoming 6G and VVC codec licensing models will likely face similar proactive jurisdictional challenges in London if pool administrators set non-negotiable global terms, despite Access Advance warning UK courts against such intervention.
Read full article at quinnemanuel.com
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source