News Corp sues Brave for reselling scraped content to AI firms
This article provides a comprehensive overview of legal actions and licensing agreements between news publishers and AI companies. It details ongoing litigation involving firms like OpenAI, Perplexity, Brave, and Cohere, alongside numerous commercial deals aimed at governing the use of publisher content in generative AI models.
Key Takeaways
- News Corp alleges Brave bundled 250-word snippets of Wall Street Journal and New York Post content for resale to AI developers.
- Brave masks its web crawlers to evade publisher blocks, according to the lawsuit filed in Oakland federal court.
- The publisher seeks statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringement and a permanent injunction against the practices.
- The legal battle began in March 2025 with a preemptive lawsuit from Brave seeking a fair use declaration for its indexing activities.
Why It Matters
The lawsuit signals a shift in publisher strategy from targeting LLM creators directly to disrupting the secondary data marketplaces that supply them. By suing a search engine for packaging and selling news data as an API, News Corp is attempting to close a loop that allows AI firms to bypass its official licensing deals, such as its $250 million OpenAI agreement. This case will likely clarify whether search engines' traditional fair use protections for indexing extend to the commercial sale of aggregated training data. Watch for whether judicial rulings distinguish between public search indexing and the wholesale data extraction used specifically for RAG or model training.
Additional Context
Additional context.
News Corp’s aggressive legal stance follows a period of successfully establishing high-value commercial partnerships with the industry's largest AI players. In May 2024, the company announced a five-year global partnership with OpenAI reportedly worth more than $250 million, granting the ChatGPT creator access to content from marquee titles including The Wall Street Journal and The Sunday Times. This was bolstered in March 2026 by a multi-year deal with Meta, valued at up to $50 million annually, per MediaCopilot and Mediaweek. These agreements are part of what CEO Robert Thomson has described as a "woo and a sue" strategy: partnering with companies willing to pay for content while litigating against those that scrape without a license.
Brave, meanwhile, has positioned itself as an underdog defending the right to index the web. Since filing its initial preemptive lawsuit in March 2025, the company has argued that its activities are fundamental to search engine operation and that News Corp is attempting to "bully" smaller rivals to benefit larger incumbents like Google and Microsoft, per Reuters. The dispute has intensified as Brave’s "Data for AI API" and integrated summarization tools became central to its business model. While standard search snippets are typically brief, News Corp alleges Brave’s AI-focused products generate summaries up to five times longer than industry norms, effectively serving as a substitute for original articles.
This litigation is part of a broader wave of industry-defining copyright cases. In June 2026, more than 30 local US newspapers joined the fray by suing OpenAI and Microsoft, while CNN launched a similar action against Perplexity in May 2026, according to recent reporting from Press Gazette and Bloomberg Law. These cases collectively pressure AI companies to prove that their use of publisher data qualifies as "transformative" under fair use, even as platforms like Perplexity claim that "you can't copyright facts."
Read full article at pressgazette.co.uk
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source