Munich court proposes €1.05 monthly Netflix codec royalty per subscriber
The Munich I Regional Court has issued non-binding FRAND guidelines proposing aggregate monthly codec royalties for streaming services, specifically citing Netflix and Disney+ as examples. The court rejected arguments that device-level licensing exhausts patent rights, asserting that streaming providers are independently liable for video codec royalties.
Key Takeaways
- Proposed monthly rates reach €1.05 for Netflix premium tiers and €0.84 for Disney+ premium tiers.
- Court rejected patent exhaustion arguments, ruling that streaming services are independently liable even if playback devices are licensed.
- Aggregate annual royalties could reach €4.1 billion for Netflix based on a top-down calculation of 16% to 25% of subscription revenue.
- Judges dismissed patent pool rates as benchmarks, favoring bilateral negotiations for stronger patent portfolios.
Why It Matters
This judicial framework shifts the financial burden of video standards directly onto streaming platforms, challenging the long-held industry assumption that hardware manufacturers handle codec licensing. By decoupling service liability from device exhaustion, the court creates a massive new cost center for high-resolution streaming providers. This move strengthens the leverage of patent holders outside major pools like Access Advance, as the court signaled that pool rates do not cap what bilateral licensors can demand. The broader ecosystem must now account for potential royalty stacks across AVC, HEVC, and AV1 that were previously unquantified. Watch for whether other European jurisdictions adopt this 'top-down' revenue-based calculation in upcoming patent litigation.
Additional Context
The Munich court's FRAND guidelines arrive amid an accelerating effort by patent pools to extend codec licensing obligations from device manufacturers to content providers. Access Advance, which administers the HEVC Advance patent pool, announced in March 2025 a new streaming licensing program targeting video-on-demand and live-streaming services that would require platforms distributing HEVC-encoded content to obtain separate licenses regardless of whether their users' devices are already licensed. The program initially covers HEVC but is structured to expand to VVC as adoption grows. Avanci, best known for its automotive patent licensing model, expanded its video codec licensing efforts in late 2024 by appointing Katalin Tözsér to lead its streaming and broadcast licensing division, signaling a deliberate pivot toward the same service-provider liability theory the Munich court endorsed.
The financial stakes of this shift are substantial. Netflix reported approximately 301 million global subscribers as of its Q1 2025 earnings, meaning even a €1.05 monthly royalty applied only to premium-tier subscribers in a single jurisdiction could represent tens of millions of euros annually. Disney+ carries roughly 124 million subscribers globally. A 2024 analysis by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute noted that cumulative royalty demands across HEVC, AVC, and VVC patent pools could exceed 2% of streaming revenue if applied at the service layer, a figure that would compress already thin margins for ad-supported tiers. The Munich court's top-down approach, which calculates royalties as a percentage of subscription revenue rather than per-stream or per-device, gives licensors a scalable formula that grows with platform revenue rather than being capped by hardware unit volumes.
On the technical side, the codec landscape complicates royalty stacking. Netflix has been among the most aggressive adopters of AV1, announcing in January 2025 that AV1 now accounts for more than 30% of its streaming hours on supported devices, partly to reduce dependence on HEVC and its associated patent obligations. However, AV1 is not royalty-free in practice; the Alliance for Open Media's patent covenant covers only contributions from member companies, and Sisvel launched an AV1 patent pool in April 2025 with commitments from over 30 patent holders, creating a parallel licensing track that streaming services must now evaluate. The Munich court's framework, if adopted by other European jurisdictions, would mean that even platforms migrating to AV1 face potential royalty exposure at the service layer, undermining the cost-reduction rationale that drove AV1 adoption in the first place.
Read full article at streaminglearningcenter.com
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source