Mewburn Ellis hires Deborah Bould to lead tech patent litigation
Patent litigation firm Mewburn Ellis has appointed veteran attorney Deborah Bould as a new Partner to expand its engineering and technology practice. Bould specializes in standard-essential patents (SEPs) and FRAND licensing, with a focus on areas like video codecs and IoT connectivity.
Key Takeaways
- Deborah Bould joins Mewburn Ellis as Partner to expand its engineering and technology patent litigation practice across the UK and Europe.
- Bould specializes in SEP and FRAND disputes, with specific technical expertise in video codecs, IoT, and AI-related patent assertions.
- The hire follows a series of disputes team expansions at the firm, including the recent additions of Camilla Balleny, Amy Crouch, and Aled Richards-Jones.
- Bould’s experience includes managing multi-jurisdictional litigation across the US, China, and Europe, including the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
Why It Matters
The recruitment signals a strategic shift for European patent firms toward the emerging 'streaming wars' of video codec intellectual property. As streaming services transition to newer standards like VVC and HEVC, the risk of cross-border SEP litigation increases significantly for both platform operators and device manufacturers. Mewburn Ellis is positioning itself to handle the expected surge in FRAND disputes under the Unified Patent Court's jurisdiction, which allows for centralized enforcement across most of Europe. Stakeholders should monitor whether this expansion correlates with more aggressive patent assertions from non-practicing entities (NPEs) in the codec space.
Additional Context
The expansion of Mewburn Ellis's litigation team occurs as the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and UK courts set critical precedents for standard-essential patents. Per Juve Patent, October 2024, the UK Court of Appeal issued a landmark ruling in Panasonic v. Xiaomi, granting the first-ever 'interim' FRAND license and labeling the patent holder an 'unwilling licensor' for pursuing parallel injunctions in the UPC. This highlighted a growing jurisdictional friction between London and the newly operational UPC in Mannheim, where judges have shown a higher willingness to grant permanent injunctions, as seen in the Philips v. Belkin decision reported by IPWatchdog in October 2025. Simultaneously, the technical focus of patent disputes is moving beyond cellular standards toward video compression and media delivery technology. According to reporting from Fish & Richardson in February 2026, litigation involving video codec SEPs increased by 103% between 2020 and 2025, even as traditional cellular SEP actions declined. This surge is largely driven by fragmented licensing infrastructures for newer standards like HEVC (H.265) and VVC (H.266), which often involve multiple competing patent pools rather than the single-pool model used for H.264. Regulatory scrutiny is also intensifying as standard-setting organizations grapple with cross-jurisdictional enforcement strategies. Per Cornerstone Research, March 2026, video codec disputes increasingly resemble the earlier 'smartphone wars,' with litigation extending to streaming platforms and cloud service providers. The hiring of specialists like Bould reflects a broader trend among European intellectual property firms to build multi-jurisdictional defense and enforcement squads capable of navigating these increasingly complex and high-stakes royalty negotiations for digital media companies.
Read full article at pulse2.com
Get this in your inbox → Subscribe
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source