Japanese court invalidates RED compressed RAW patent, affecting Nikon licensing
Japan's Intellectual Property High Court has upheld the invalidation of a RED compressed RAW patent, rejecting an appeal by Nikon. While this ruling impacts licensing in the Japanese market, RED's US patent portfolio remains intact, and the decision does not affect existing camera firmware or global licensing agreements.
Key Takeaways
- Japan's IP High Court rejected Nikon's appeal, confirming the invalidation of RED's primary Japanese compressed RAW patent.
- The ruling only affects the Japanese jurisdiction; RED's U.S. patent portfolio remains legally intact and enforceable.
- Panasonic, which led the challenge, currently offers ProRes RAW on its LUMIX GH7 and S1 series through existing licensing models.
- A newer 2021 U.S. patent filed by James Jannard and Jarred Land extends compressed RAW protection to mobile devices until 2038.
Why It Matters
The invalidation of RED’s Japanese patent represents a rare regulatory defeat for a technology that has dictated the terms of high-end internal recording for two decades. While the immediate impact is limited to the Japanese market, the court's public reasoning provides a roadmap for competitors like Sony or Apple to challenge RED’s remaining global IP. For the streaming ecosystem, this could eventually lower the licensing barriers for high-bitrate content capture, though Nikon’s ownership of newer mobile-focused patents suggests the legal battlefield is shifting toward consumer devices and tablets. Industry observers should watch for similar validity challenges in the U.S. or EU following this specific Japanese judgment.
Additional Context
The Japanese ruling follows a decade of aggressive litigation by RED to protect its proprietary internal compression. Per DPReview, Apple attempted to invalidate RED's U.S. patents in 2019 by arguing the technology was an 'obvious' combination of existing art, but the U.S. Patent Office ultimately ruled in RED's favor. Similarly, Sony faced patent infringement claims in 2013 regarding its CineAlta F5 and F55 cameras before reaching a resolution that left RED's core IP standing. These legal hurdles led companies like Atomos to build a business model around external recorders that bypass internal restrictions via licensed ProRes RAW output.
Nikon’s acquisition of RED in March 2024 for an undisclosed sum fundamentally changed these dynamics. Before the merger, RED had sued Nikon in 2022 for allegedly infringing on its compression patents with the Nikon Z9 camera. That case was dismissed in April 2023, paving the way for the acquisition. As the new parent company, Nikon now finds itself defending the very patents it once contested in court. According to Nikon’s recent financial filings, the company does not expect the Japanese ruling to significantly impact its bottom line, likely due to the acquisition including a broader 'active continuation family' of patents that extend through 2038.
In the broader professional market, the shift toward internal RAW recording is already accelerating despite legal friction. Panasonic’s 2024 launch of the LUMIX GH7 included internal ProRes RAW, signaling that manufacturers are willing to navigate licensing costs to meet user demand. As 8K and high-frame-rate production becomes standard for streaming platforms, the cost of these licenses remains a significant factor in camera hardware margins. The Japanese court's finding of 'obviousness' could embolden other regional manufacturers to seek similar invalidation rulings to reduce their operational overhead.
Read full article at redsharknews.com
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source