EU VLOP designation forces ChatGPT and Roblox into strict compliance
The European Commission has officially designated ChatGPT, Reddit, and Roblox as Very Large Online Platforms or Search Engines under the Digital Services Act. These platforms must now comply with stringent EU requirements regarding risk management, algorithmic transparency, and independent auditing by early 2027.
Key Takeaways
- ChatGPT is now regulated as a search engine after reporting 159 million monthly active users in the EU.
- Roblox becomes the first gaming platform classified as a Very Large Online Platform, setting a precedent for user-generated content regulation.
- Non-compliance with the Digital Services Act carries potential penalties of up to 6% of global annual turnover.
- Designated platforms must provide users with an option for a non-personalized feed and publish advertisement repositories.
Why It Matters
The classification of ChatGPT as a search engine signals that conversational AI tools will no longer operate outside established regulatory frameworks, forcing OpenAI to manage dual compliance under the DSA and the EU AI Act. For the broader streaming and social ecosystem, this move places OpenAI and Roblox under the same scrutiny as YouTube and TikTok, likely triggering the 'Brussels Effect' where platforms apply stricter EU moderation standards globally to reduce operational costs. This shift prioritizes child safety and algorithmic transparency over pure engagement metrics. Watch for the results of the first independent audits in early 2027 to see how these platforms adjust their recommendation engines.
Additional Context
The European Commission's DSA enforcement apparatus has been steadily expanding since the regulation took full effect in February 2024. In May 2025, the Commission opened formal proceedings against TikTok over addictive design features and child safety failures, marking one of the first major enforcement actions against an already-designated VLOP. That case established a precedent for how Brussels interprets systemic risk obligations, particularly around minors, which directly informs the compliance burden now facing Roblox and ChatGPT. Henna Virkkunen, the EU's Executive Vice President for Tech Sovereignty, has signaled that the Commission intends to apply the DSA's risk-assessment framework to AI-generated content surfaces, not just traditional social feeds.
On the business and licensing side, OpenAI faces a uniquely complex compliance stack. The EU AI Act entered into force in August 2024 with phased obligations for general-purpose AI models beginning in August 2025, meaning OpenAI must simultaneously satisfy DSA transparency requirements as a designated search engine and AI Act obligations as a general-purpose AI provider. Reddit, which went public in March 2024, has already invested in EU-specific trust and safety infrastructure. The company disclosed in its Q2 2025 earnings call that DSA compliance costs contributed to a 12% year-over-year increase in general and administrative expenses, a figure that analysts expect to rise further once independent auditing requirements take effect in early 2027. Roblox, meanwhile, has been building out its age-verification and parental controls suite, which the company positions as a competitive differentiator in the family gaming market.
Technical benchmarks for DSA compliance are still emerging, but early data from designated platforms offers useful reference points. Meta published its first DSA transparency report in February 2025, revealing that it had removed over 2 billion pieces of content flagged by automated systems in the preceding six months, though critics noted the report lacked granular detail on false-positive rates. For ChatGPT, the technical challenge is distinct: the platform must demonstrate algorithmic transparency for a generative model whose outputs are non-deterministic, unlike the recommendation feeds of TikTok or YouTube. A joint study by the Algorithmic Transparency Institute and the University of Amsterdam published in June 2025 found that current DSA audit methodologies are poorly suited to evaluating generative AI systems, recommending new frameworks that assess training-data provenance and output distribution rather than individual content decisions. This gap will likely shape how the Commission evaluates OpenAI's first compliance submission.
Read full article at socialday.live
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source