EU court defines active recipient metrics for Digital Services Act enforcement
The EU General Court has clarified the definition of 'active recipients' under the Digital Services Act to include users exposed to content without direct interaction. This ruling impacts how platforms like Meta, TikTok, and Zalando are designated as Very Large Online Platforms and determines their supervisory fee structures.
Key Takeaways
- Active recipients now include users who are exposed to hosted information without clicking, commenting, or registering.
- EU General Court annulled Commission decisions on 2023 supervisory fees for Meta and TikTok due to procedural errors.
- The European Commission has 12 months to adopt a formal delegated act establishing a valid fee calculation methodology.
- Zalando's challenge to its Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) designation was rejected despite its curated hybrid business model.
- Platforms reaching the 45 million user threshold face the DSA's strictest compliance mandates and oversight costs.
Why It Matters
Broadening the user count metric ensures that passive consumption—the backbone of streaming and social video—is fully captured under EU regulatory oversight. For streaming platforms, this prevents the exclusion of 'lurkers' from reach statistics, likely keeping more services above the 45 million user threshold for VLOP designation. While the ruling provides immediate clarity on what constitutes a recipient, the annulment of specific fee structures creates a temporary vacuum in how these costs are distributed. Market participants should watch for the Commission’s upcoming delegated act, which will formalize the technical methodology for counting cross-platform users and likely lead to higher supervisory costs for services with high reach but low engagement.
Additional Context
The Digital Services Act (DSA) framework divides online services into categories based on systemic risk, with the top tier—Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs)—facing the most rigorous transparency and audit requirements. Per the Law Society of Ireland in September 2025, the General Court’s decision to annul the initial fee decisions for Meta and TikTok was a procedural victory for the tech giants, but not a relief from their underlying obligation to pay. The court specifically noted that while the methodology was flawed, the platforms still owed fees for the 2023 cycle.
In related regulatory pressure, the Commission has increasingly focused on algorithmic design as a component of systemic risk. Per Tech Policy Press in August 2026, recent preliminary findings against TikTok and Meta have demanded changes to core features like personalized recommendation systems to mitigate mental health harms. This indicates that once a platform is designated as a VLOP via the user metrics clarified by the court, the subsequent enforcement focuses heavily on technical architecture and user safety rather than just content moderation.
Further legal scrutiny remains active across the ecosystem. Per Reuters in early 2026, other major platforms including X (formerly Twitter) have faced direct financial sanctions, including a €120 million fine in late 2025 for breaches related to researcher data access and deceptive design practices. As Zalando continues to appeal its designation to the Court of Justice of the European Union, the finality of the 'active recipient' definition will set the long-term cost of doing business in the European digital market for both retailers and media distributors.
Read full article at dig.watch
Enjoy our coverage?
Add StreamingMeme as a preferred source on Google to see more of our streaming news at the top of your Search results.
Add as preferred source