CRTC triples mandatory streamer revenue contributions to 15% for local content

This move represents an aggressive pivot in Canadian cultural protectionism, significantly raising the cost of operation for global platforms like Netflix and Disney+. By tripling the 'base contribution,' the CRTC is forcing a multi-billion dollar reallocation of streaming revenue to support a domestic production sector struggling with the decline of traditional broadcast. However, the decision risks immediate trade retaliation. U.S. officials and industry groups have already labeled the requirement a discriminatory tax, potentially complicating upcoming USMCA trade negotiations. Watch for the Federal Court of Appeal's ruling on the initial 5% levy, which could invalidate the legal foundation for this new 15% threshold.

The CRTC’s decision to triple contribution requirements has intensified a long-standing trade dispute between Ottawa and Washington. Per the Associated Press in May 2026, major U.S.-based streamers including Apple, Amazon, and Spotify are already litigating the initial 5% base contribution established in 2024. The Motion Picture Association-Canada has argued that the mandates are discriminatory, highlighting that foreign studios already invested over $7.5 billion in the Canadian sector during the 2021-2022 period without regulatory compulsion.

Political tension escalated further in June 2026 when the Canadian government directed the CRTC to reconsider parts of this framework. According to Global News in June 2026, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture Marc Miller expressed concern that tripling the fees could increase consumer subscription costs. To mitigate these impacts, the federal government announced a $600 million annual investment to support the industry while the mandatory streamer payments remain frozen in court proceedings.

Industry stakeholders remain divided over the mechanism of these contributions. While Canadian broadcasters and independent producers, represented by the Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB), view the 15% requirement as a necessary stabilizer, international platforms contend it operates as a digital services tax. Per Reuters in July 2024, U.S. Ambassador David Cohen previously warned that such levies fall outside international tax principles, an friction point that has only sharpened as Canada approaches the 2026 review of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA).