Amazon sellers protest ad automation and end of credit card payments

The shift toward mandatory automation and direct revenue deduction signals a tightening of Amazon's grip on the seller technology stack. By eliminating credit card ‘float’ and cashback, Amazon is effectively increasing the cost of growth while reducing granular control over ad placements. For the broader ecosystem, this sets a precedent for walled gardens to prioritize high-margin automated networks over advertiser transparency. The immediate consequence is a squeeze on middle-market seller margins, which may force a flight to diversified retail media networks. Watch the volume of Sponsored Products surfacing in Alexa for Shopping queries to gauge how aggressively Amazon pushes automated AI inventory.

The standoff between Amazon and its million-dollar merchants occurs alongside intensifying regulatory and logistical pressure on third-party sellers. Per Supply Chain Dive in December 2023, Amazon introduced an 'inbound placement service fee' averaging $0.27 per unit for standard items, shifting the cost of inventory distribution closer to customers directly onto the seller. This was followed by a 3.5% fuel and logistics surcharge in early 2024 to combat rising oil prices, according to Modern Retail and CNBC reporting. These cumulative costs have sparked internal surveys within the MDS community, where 80% of members reported that payment policy shifts alone would lock up at least a quarter of their available operating cash.

Technologically, Amazon is rapidly evolving its discovery layer. In May 2024, the company rebranded its Rufus AI assistant to ‘Alexa for Shopping,’ integrating it as a persistent agent across Amazon.com, its mobile app, and Echo devices. According to Amazon’s announcement, active Sponsored Products campaigns are now auto-eligible for injection into these AI-driven conversations without a separate opt-in or dedicated reporting line. This lack of transparency mirrors the concerns raised during the MDS boycott regarding 'forced' campaign settings. Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission’s ongoing antitrust lawsuit continues to scrutinize Amazon's 'interlocking' strategies, with a trial scheduled for October 2026. Per the FTC, the agency alleges Amazon overcharges sellers and creates barriers to competition through price-matching algorithms and tied fulfillment services, providing a backdrop of legal peril for any further platform-wide margin extraction.