Canada’s Online Streaming Act in Limbo Following Government Policy U-Turn
CRTC Chairperson Vicky Eatrides expressed uncertainty about the implications of Canada's U-turn on regulating streaming services under the Online Streaming Act, leading to strategic difficulties for Canadian producers and buyers. The government is backing away from mandating contributions from US streamers, instead offering a C$600M funding boost, which critics suggest is insufficient. This lack of clear policy direction creates instability for the Canadian TV and film sector.
Key Takeaways
- CRTC Chair Vicky Eatrides stated she lacks clarity on how implementation will proceed until the federal government issues new formal policy directions.
- Federal government and CRTC shifted away from a planned 15% revenue contribution mandate for foreign streamers like Netflix and Disney+.
- The C$600M (US$430M) annual funding package is under fire by CMPA board chair Kyle Irving, who estimates only 25% will reach independent producers.
- Production executives at Blink49 Studios and Fathom Film Group cite 'chaos' in the development market due to shifting investment and regulatory rails.
Why It Matters
The federal pushback on the CRTC’s aggressive 15% levy signals a prioritization of consumer affordability and trade relations over fixed domestic protectionism. For US streamers, this represents a major reprieve from mandatory revenue shares, but for the Canadian production ecosystem, it replaces predictable regulatory 'rails' with discretionary, potentially thinner government grants. The resulting policy vacuum stalls long-term development cycles for drama and comedy that rely on multi-year cash flow projections. Stakeholders must now monitor the specifics of Ottawa’s upcoming 'policy directions' to see if any mandatory contribution baseline remains.
Additional Context
The federal reversal follows the CRTC’s May 21, 2026, decision to triple mandatory contributions for foreign streamers from 5% to 15% of annual Canadian revenue. Per CBC News, that ruling was intended to stabilize approximately C$2 billion in annual content funding. However, the move drew immediate criticism from US officials and trade groups. According to CTV News (June 2026), the US Ambassador to Canada described the levy as 'discriminatory,' and early June reports from The Canadian Press highlighted that the Online Streaming Act had become a significant trade irritant in the lead-up to the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) review. Heritage Minister Marc Miller explicitly linked the policy pivot to cost-of-living concerns, stating on June 3, 2026, that the government would not risk passing higher subscription costs to consumers. This maneuver essentially shifts the financial burden of cultural support from private Silicon Valley giants to Canadian taxpayers through a C$600M bridge fund. Per analysis by Michael Geist (June 2026), this transition is expected to trigger a fresh round of CRTC proceedings, as the Broadcasting Act lacks a simple 'review-and-vary' power for expenditure decisions, necessitating a new regulatory framework to be built from scratch. Meanwhile, existing legal challenges against the original 5% levy from 2024 remain active in the Federal Court of Appeal.
Read full article at c21media.net